SOC 2 vs HIPAA: Key Differences, Compliance Requirements, and Which One You Need

Check out the new compliance progress tracker


Product Pricing Demo Video Free HIPAA Training
LATEST
video thumbnail
Admin Dashboard Walkthrough Jake guides you step-by-step through the process of achieving HIPAA compliance
Ready to get started? Book a demo with our team
Talk to an expert

SOC 2 vs HIPAA: Key Differences, Compliance Requirements, and Which One You Need

Kevin Henry

HIPAA

August 04, 2025

7 minutes read
Share this article
SOC 2 vs HIPAA: Key Differences, Compliance Requirements, and Which One You Need

SOC 2 Compliance Framework

SOC 2 is an independent attestation that evaluates how well your organization designs and operates controls to protect customer data. Built on the AICPA Trust Services Criteria—Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy—it lets you show customers you follow mature Security Control Frameworks without prescribing one fixed way to implement them.

There are two report types. Type I assesses control design at a point in time. Type II tests the operating effectiveness of those controls over a defined period, typically aligning to Annual Third-Party Audits performed by an independent CPA firm. Most buyers in healthcare prefer a recent Type II report because it demonstrates sustained performance.

What auditors evaluate

  • Governance and Risk Assessment Procedures: how you identify, score, and treat risks; ownership and cadence of reviews.
  • Data Confidentiality Controls: access management, encryption in transit/at rest, key management, and secure data disposal.
  • Change management and SDLC: peer review, separation of duties, and deployment gates.
  • Monitoring and logging: audit trails, alerting thresholds, and incident tracking.
  • Incident Response Planning: documented playbooks, roles, communications, and post-incident reviews.

Because SOC 2 is risk-based and outcomes-focused, you tailor controls to your size, technology stack, and customer commitments, then prove—through evidence—that they work as intended.

HIPAA Regulatory Requirements

HIPAA is a U.S. law governing the privacy and security of Protected Health Information (PHI). It applies to Covered Entities (health plans, healthcare providers, clearinghouses) and Business Associates that create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI on their behalf.

HIPAA contains three core rules. The Privacy Rule governs permissible uses and disclosures of PHI and individual rights. The Security Rule requires administrative, physical, and technical safeguards, anchored by ongoing Risk Assessment Procedures. The Breach Notification Rule mandates notifying affected individuals, HHS, and sometimes the media without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days following discovery of a breach.

There is no government-issued “HIPAA certification.” Compliance is demonstrated through policies, safeguards, training, and thorough documentation. Office for Civil Rights Enforcement (OCR) investigates complaints and breaches, can require corrective action plans, and may impose civil monetary penalties for noncompliance.

Operational expectations

  • Document where PHI resides and how it flows across systems and vendors.
  • Implement role-based access, encryption, integrity controls, and audit logging for PHI systems.
  • Execute Business Associate Agreements with vendors handling PHI.
  • Train workforce members annually and upon role change.
  • Maintain Incident Response Planning that covers breach assessment and notification.

Key Differences Between SOC 2 and HIPAA

  • Nature: SOC 2 is a voluntary attestation examining controls against trust criteria; HIPAA is a federal law with prescriptive requirements for PHI.
  • Applicability: SOC 2 fits service providers across industries; HIPAA applies only to Covered Entities and Business Associates that handle PHI in the U.S.
  • Outcome: SOC 2 yields a CPA’s attestation report your customers review; HIPAA yields an internal compliance program subject to Office for Civil Rights Enforcement.
  • Audit cadence: SOC 2 typically involves Annual Third-Party Audits for Type II; HIPAA does not mandate external audits, though many conduct independent assessments.
  • Scope focus: SOC 2 scopes systems and services you choose; HIPAA scopes all processes and systems that create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI.

Overlapping Security Controls

Although distinct, both frameworks expect disciplined security practices. Building once and mapping controls to both reduces effort and strengthens outcomes.

Ready to simplify HIPAA compliance?

Join thousands of organizations that trust Accountable to manage their compliance needs.

  • Access control: least privilege, MFA, provisioning/deprovisioning workflows, periodic access reviews.
  • Encryption and Data Confidentiality Controls: strong ciphers, key management, and secure backups.
  • Audit logging and monitoring: immutable logs, centralized analysis, and alert triage.
  • Risk Assessment Procedures: recurring risk identification, treatment plans, and management sign-off.
  • Incident Response Planning: defined roles, runbooks, tabletop exercises, and lessons learned.
  • Secure development and change management: code reviews, dependency scanning, and controlled releases.
  • Vendor risk management: due diligence for SOC 2; BAAs plus security reviews for HIPAA vendors.
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery: RTO/RPO objectives, tested restoration procedures.

Compliance Audit Processes

SOC 2 audit lifecycle

  • Scoping: define systems, services, locations, and Trust Services Criteria to include.
  • Readiness: gap analysis, policy updates, control owners, and evidence repositories.
  • Control operation: run controls consistently during the audit period; collect artifacts.
  • Independent testing: CPA firm performs walkthroughs, samples evidence, and evaluates exceptions.
  • Reporting: receive the Type I or Type II attestation; repeat via Annual Third-Party Audits to maintain continuity.

HIPAA compliance cycle

  • Inventory and data mapping: identify PHI systems, data flows, and third parties.
  • Risk Assessment Procedures: conduct and update a security risk analysis; document remediation plans.
  • Safeguard implementation: administrative, physical, and technical controls aligned to PHI risks.
  • Policies, training, and awareness: workforce onboarding, annual refreshers, and sanctions for violations.
  • Monitoring and incident management: detect, investigate, and document security incidents and potential breaches.
  • Documentation and review: keep evidence current; prepare for inquiries from Office for Civil Rights Enforcement.

Benefits of SOC 2 for Healthcare

For digital health platforms, health IT vendors, and service providers, SOC 2 is often a prerequisite in enterprise procurement and a powerful trust signal alongside HIPAA obligations.

  • Customer assurance: a recent Type II report answers security questionnaires up front and speeds deals.
  • Structured improvement: periodic testing surfaces issues early and drives measurable remediation.
  • Alignment with HIPAA: many SOC 2 controls map naturally to HIPAA safeguards, especially around Data Confidentiality Controls, access, and logging.
  • Independent validation: Annual Third-Party Audits by a CPA firm substantiate your claims with objective evidence.
  • Scalability: a reusable control set spans multiple products and customers across healthcare ecosystems.

Choosing the Right Compliance Standard

Decision quick guide

  • If you create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI for healthcare clients, you need HIPAA as a matter of law.
  • If you sell services to healthcare but do not handle PHI, SOC 2 is typically the best-fit way to prove security maturity.
  • If you both handle PHI and sell B2B, pursue HIPAA compliance and a SOC 2 Type II report to satisfy legal duties and buyer expectations.
  • Start by mapping risks and current controls; then align artifacts so the same evidence supports both frameworks wherever possible.

Conclusion

Viewed together, SOC 2 vs HIPAA is not an either–or decision. HIPAA defines what you must do when PHI is involved; SOC 2 proves, through independent attestation, how well you run security across your services. Most healthcare-facing vendors benefit from both: HIPAA to meet legal requirements and SOC 2 to win trust and accelerate growth.

FAQs.

What is the main difference between SOC 2 and HIPAA?

SOC 2 is a voluntary attestation evaluating your organization’s security controls against the Trust Services Criteria, resulting in a CPA report. HIPAA is a U.S. law that mandates safeguards for PHI and is enforced by the government.

How does SOC 2 support HIPAA compliance?

SOC 2 formalizes processes—like access control, logging, Risk Assessment Procedures, and Incident Response Planning—that HIPAA also expects. The evidence you gather for SOC 2 often maps directly to HIPAA administrative, technical, and physical safeguards.

Who needs to comply with HIPAA?

Covered Entities (providers, health plans, clearinghouses) and Business Associates that create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI must comply. If you handle PHI for these entities, HIPAA applies regardless of company size or technology stack.

Can an organization comply with both SOC 2 and HIPAA simultaneously?

Yes. Many healthcare vendors maintain HIPAA programs while undergoing SOC 2 Type II Annual Third-Party Audits. Building unified controls lets you satisfy legal requirements and deliver a recognized attestation report to customers.

Share this article

Ready to simplify HIPAA compliance?

Join thousands of organizations that trust Accountable to manage their compliance needs.

Related Articles